Building a College Around Its Students

The Institute opened in Nashville in the fall of 2004 with twelve students, seven staff members, and rented space at Perimeter Park. Its early circumstances made the work of establishing a college unusually visible. Teaching, administration, facilities, and finances had to develop alongside the education the founding group had gathered to provide.

The idea had begun taking a more definite form the previous summer. In 2003, Gregg Garner invited his father, Dr. Mike Garner, to Nashville to help establish the school. Mike and his wife, Trinidad, moved there, and he became the Institute’s founding director and academic dean. The first students arrived the following year.

Garner has traced an important part of the school’s design to his own university experience. He valued the education he had received, while also carrying substantial debt from it. The question he brought to the Institute was whether serious study could be organized in a way that left graduates greater freedom to choose their work afterward.

Affordability therefore shaped the institution’s operating decisions. Staffing, the use of space, and the pace of development all had financial consequences for students. Keeping the cost of a degree manageable required those decisions to support the same objective over time.

That arrangement depended heavily on the people who helped establish the school. Mike Garner taught extensively and volunteered through its formative years. According to the archive’s account, he also committed personal resources, including part of his retirement. Other faculty, staff, and family members contributed labor and money. Their contributions carried costs that would otherwise have fallen elsewhere.

The archive records that every graduate through the end of the 2024–25 academic year completed the program without debt incurred to acquire the degree at the Institute. Garner regards that outcome as central to the founding project. The record also makes clear how closely it depended on the generosity of the people sustaining the institution.

The academic model connected sustained study with practical responsibility. Students encountered the daily work of a campus as well as its coursework. Helping operate programs, maintain facilities, and support events gave them opportunities to see how decisions about resources and responsibility affected other people.

As the school developed, its practices also had to become legible to outside reviewers. A formal accreditation process began in 2017. Candidate status followed in 2021, and initial accreditation in 2024. Curriculum, governance, assessment, and student services had to be documented in forms that an accrediting team could examine.

Garner credits the administration, faculty, and staff with making that process possible. Their work involved articulating and demonstrating the education the school had spent years developing. The eventual milestone rested on a long accumulation of teaching, administration, and institutional decisions.

Seen across those two decades, the Institute’s founding history turns on the relationship between an educational promise and the arrangements needed to keep it. Affordability required a workable budget. Serious study required a curriculum and capable teachers. Practical responsibility required opportunities to undertake consequential work. The college developed as those commitments acquired an everyday institutional form.

← All Looking Back articles